On Writing and the Value of NaNo

It’s been a while since I posted anything but News up in here.  That’s going to change.  Since actions are better than words, it’s changing now.

Writing is an odd sort of activity.  It’s creative, but unlike a lot of creative activities, there isn’t a great deal to show for it when you’re done.  OK, that’s not quite true.  You may have a full notebook or a typed manuscript, but compare that to a sculptor or painter or even a singer.  A full length novel is somewhere around 80,000 words long, give or take.  An experienced author who can touch type can write a first draft at around 1000 words an hour.  That means working 40 hours a week, an author will take a full two weeks to write a novel.

OK, novelists.  Put down the LARTs.  I have a point to make.  If you’re still upset at me afterward, you can adjust my attitude to your heart’s content.

At any rate, compare that manuscript to two weeks of work from a sculptor.  They’re probably going to have something fairly impressive for that amount of work.  A human-sized whatsit at least.  For the painter?  Something equally large or intricate.  For the singer or musician?  They’ll have an album.  Less visually impressive, but harder to look away from if they start singing it.  Now, at this point some of you who sculpt or paint or sing are going to start going on about research, or prep time.  No dice, fellas.  I was only including the actual hands-on-the-keyboard time for the writer.  They have to do research too.  I’m assuming it varies more from artist to artist than it does from art form to art form, honestly.

Now, the final results for the novelist are less visually impressive.  What really stinks is that the intermediate results are even less comparitively impressive than the final ones.  The sculptor will have half a sculpture, or a half-carved whatsit if he’s carving marble or whatnot.  The painter will have a half full canvas, or a background with details to add.  The singer will have half his tracks recorded, and be able to sing them to you whenever you ask.  Whenever someone looks in on another type of artist, even if the artist subsequently chases them out of the room with an implement of their craft, they get to see something ‘half done’.  They get a look at a work in progress.  With a writer, on the other hand, you see no ‘progress’ unless they allow you to read over their shoulder, and even then it’s not likely to be impressive.  Even a musician can play you the hook of the piece to show you what they’re working on.  A writer?  Unless they’ve hit a particularly good line, one which doesn’t require setup?  Not so much.  Also, our creative tools are less viscerally threatening.  I mean, who hits someone with a laptop?  Seriously.

Now, that means we’re easier to interrupt.  As noted on CNN, interruptions are Death to creative work.  You don’t get any ‘work’ done until you’re ‘in the groove’.

That’s where NaNo comes in.  Whether you think of it as a blissful month of creation or a sink of depravity designed to produce malodorous hunks of unpublishable dreck, one thing you cannot deny is that participating makes you write.  You cannot complete NaNo without sitting down on a regular basis and churning out words.  Those words may be good, they may be awful, but they are on the page.  They’re no longer locked in the skull.  Now, if you’ve honed your Craft (Hi Leanne!), the words are more likely to be good, because they’re doing what you want them to do.  If you haven’t honed your Craft (Hint: it’s a good discussion on Art and Craft), it’s an opportunity to do so.

However, if you’ve hit the point where people are waiting for your finished product, either by dint of being published or by dint of having beta readers with guns (Hi Ian!  Ordinal WILL be finished at some point, I promise), NaNo does something else, especially if your time is fragmented.  It forces you to make your creative juices flow.  No longer is ‘I wasn’t feeling it’ an option.  You learn to find your zone, NOW.  Fragmentary time becomes valuable again.

Now, will that time ever become as valuable as long stretches of uninterrupted time?  I’m not sure.  I’ll let you know in…  (*looks at watch*) about sixteen years, at which point I’ll be able to compare summer writing time (without kids in the house) with school year writing time (without kids in the house).  ‘Cause right now, I have, as you may have guessed, kids in the house.  Small ones.  Who come up with “Daddy!  Daddy!  Daddy!  Read to me!  Play with me!  Me!  ME!  ME!ME!ME!ME!ME!”  Which is adorable, and important, but not terribly good for creating…

Unless you’ve done NaNo with the idea of having something ready for December submissions.  At which point the five minutes when they’re eating a Fruity Oaty Bar (‘makes a man out of a mouse’Smilie: ;) or the twenty minutes when the Purple Menace has them mesmerized, or the thirty seconds when they’re running in circles screaming for no particular reason can become that all important substance to a writer, especially a NaNo writer: WORDS.

Oh.  And yeah.  Lisa.  I’ll be sending you the sequel to Fae Eye as soon as the Beta Readers are done with it.  ‘Cause I know you need more Paranormal Romance with Quantum Chromodynamics references.  Smilie: :-)

Category(s): Book News, Philosophy, Writing

7 Responses to On Writing and the Value of NaNo

  1. Interesting post. I’d like to meet this author who can write a novel in two work weeks. I think I’d be scared to have it edited and find out that it needs to be rewritten but every writer is different.

    Good luck with your new submission!

    • Honestly, I’m thinking if I had a fully conceived idea, all my research done, and NO interruptions, I could do it. Of course, I’ve never got all three, so it’s kind of a moot point. I have written around 20,000 passably good words in one sitting before though.

      Anything I wrote like that would need a minimum of three rounds of rewrites before it was ready for public consumption, but I need those no matter how much time I spend. First I look through it and fix what I can see, then my (fabulous, incredible) beta readers tell me what they see, then my (wonderful, brilliant) editors do the same. At the end, the story is still there, but minus the kibble and with explanation of my insanity added.

      Thanks for the well wishes!

    • I love reading these articles because they’re short but infomartvie.

  2. First, thank you so much for the shout out.
    Now, as for writers having nothing to report. I beg to differ.
    To my husband, I focus on numbers. As in, “I reached a personal high today 19, 000 words on my WIP.”
    He may counter with, “Yeah, last week you were at 18, 000. So? I don’t get why you’re so excited.”
    Just overlook that, he’s not a writer. Although he could be. When he sets pen to paper brillance happens–which is maddening.
    To my writing group, I read scenes.
    They listen intently –which I deeply appreciate. Then they praise it (which I also am grateful for) before “we” tear it apart.
    With regards to NANO, let me beginning by congratulating you.
    I sat down and wrote a YA in two weeks.
    Impressed?
    Don’t be. It was TERRIBLE.
    Though at the time I thought I had spun gold.
    It seems my muse enjoy a leisurily pace, Prehaps what I need to do is keep honing my craft. No doubt what I need to do is keep honing my craft. So, without further delay, I’m off to do that now.
    Happy writing,
    Leanne
    PS Happy belated birthday.

    • Hey, I loved that discussion on Art & Craft! Of coruse I’m gonna hit you with the linky lurve!

      You make some good points, and they kinda illustrate what I mean about partially done stuff. We have to report it, or read it to someone, or actively display it. A sculptor could just step back and let someone look. I suppose a writer could do the same, but it would take more activity for an observer to appreciate our progress. One really good point you make though – writers NEED good feeback groups. They’re the ones that tell us which words are gold and which are dross.

      Thanks for the birthday wishes!

    • It’s spooky how clever some ppl are. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

     

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>